"If the prime minister tries to show strange leadership, it will cause a lot of trouble for those involved in the rescue efforts and the people affected by the disaster."

The then Prime Minister beautifully proved this during the Great East Japan Earthquake.

(Search for "calm the PM" to find the article)

----

The head of the organization is,

(1) No matter how frustrating it may be, they must not come out to the front lines but stay in the rear to keep track of the entire disaster.

and,

(2) They must be patient and let the field decide.

The prime minister was a great role model at the time, showing us the importance of such an attitude.

----

In that sense, I appreciate the Prime Minister's stance on this disaster.

I guess it depends on whether you see this as a 'lack of leadership' or not.

However, as a lower-level manager who has continued to work in the field, I can say that bosses who offer "last-minute interruptions" are a real nuisance.

Supervisors have to check on their duties. However, I don't want them to join in the project's final phase, much less make "suggestions."

----

A "senior who doesn't talk is well worth it."