2013|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2017|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2018|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2019|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2020|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2021|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2022|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2023|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2024|01|02|03|04|05|

2019-10-05 "tell "AI ​​business" to employees after hearing stores of lecture of the venture president without understanding contents of the AI ​​technology" [長年日記]

(Continuation from yesterday)

"At this time, all AWS (Amazon Web Service) textbooks published in Japan are garbage.."

The reason I am saying is because I really think so.

If asked they are "garbage", "I read the books, however, I couldn't build a system with AWS."

There is a reason for this.

The author who wrote an AWS book is a person who has almost understood AWS, and he/she tries to write te book On a full understanding, In other words, "from the goal point"

It is natural for any beginners to be treated as "garbage book"

To begin with, the introduction of these book is garbage.

In the introductions, the books has "AWS splendid" or "the future of virtualization system" in a sloppy way

But, I have to make a system using AWS as s business instruction, these stories are such just "noise".

These stories are appreciated by persons who want to

"tell "AI ​​business" to employees after hearing stores of lecture of the venture president without understanding contents of the AI ​​technology"

The persons are, in many case, president and managers who cannot embody the technical in their heads.

-----

If the president and managers insist

"I am not an engineer. Therefore it cannot be helped that we can not understand the technology",

I also insist,

"I am not a lawyer. Therefore I cannot understand the law",

"I'm not a translator. Therefore I cannot write English documents",

"I'm not an expert of accounting. Therefore it can not accounting calculation "

Then, I will reject the works of "the creation of a basis for agreement", "the writing of the English paper", and "the work of the budget management".openly and squarely.

-----

I feel hard to continue same phrase again and again, however, I say again." There is none technology called "AI"".

AI, is just a "concept".

The substance is a technology or collection of technologies that can handle huge data by scaling them up after ultra-high speed and optimization of conventional technologies.

It is not a substitute for at least "intelligence".

Of course, these are difficult technologies, which that might not be able to used by anyone.

However, it is not "technologies that nobody can understand".

Let me say it like this,

- I don't say "everyone can become a shogi master",

however,

- I don't say "nobody can understand the rules of shogi".

-----

In short, the president and managers who insist that "I am not an engineer. Therefore it cannot be helped that we can not understand the technology", is

with the presumptuous attitude

(To be continued)