(Continuation from yesterday)

When I got down to the living room on the first floor and explained to the family (wife, daughters,) about the process and the "numbers", all of them said to me "Question!".

Eldest daughter: “Daddy. The numbers are too optimistic.”

Junior daughter: "Reproductive technology is different from IT technology."

Wife: "Currently, there is no legislation for same-sex marriage in Japan"

(By the way, all of our family are "same-sex marriage supporters" (Though, there is no fact that I have "brainwashed"))

I also thought “their opinions are reasonable"

-----

However, I have added an unprecedented possibility when deriving this "subjective value".

"Bio hacker"

A bio hacker is a knowledgeable person or researcher who tries to "hack" "living organisms" or "genes".

By the way, "hacker" here means not the so-called "cracker" that damages society or individuals, but the original meaning ("advanced expert", in turn, "mania", "nerd") is.

By the way, I am one of the people who thinks “Every engineer should be self-identification of hackers".

-----

Bio technology may not be able to be discussed in the same way as IT technology, but engineers around 1970 should have thought the same way.

"Computers are occupancy of only some organizations, such as nations and large corporations, that have enormous funds and power.

Computer hardware and software (especially the operating system (OS)) were still the company's occupancy, even though it was not a complete monopoly in the PC era.

What appeared there was "Linux", that a a completely open OS.

Now, we can buy a palm-sized computer (such as a Raspberry Pi) at a price that is cheaper than the cost of my family daily foods, and the performance is exceeded for mainframes in the 1970s.

Roughly half a century has been needed.

(To be continued)