(Continuation from yesterday)

Of course, it is necessary to carefully judge whether or not public services are possible in the state of suffering from dementia, and I also understand that it is a major project related to national interests as well.

However, as mentioned here, dementia is a 100% inevitable disease.

Therefore, we must create a society that coexists with dementia.

Now, should we throw out people with dementia without question, or incorporate into society under certain rules?

"The world is watching over Japan, which has many advanced problems (low birthrate, non-maritalization, aging)."

-----

However, I think that expanding the story of such assumptions under the unclear circumstances whether the former minister has dementia.

However, I would like to allow him to use this case as a use case for raising questions based on one assumption.

Because, if the head of government shows the attitude to tackle this problem, it will be a great appeal not only to Japan but also to the world.

I am convinced that it will be a big "hope" for not only Japan but the whole world, even if there are enormous misstep of him.

-----

I know that dementia is "a disease that will give huge burdens around the patient", however, I do not think that "it is a shameful disease."

Again, as long as we live, we can not escape from dementia.

Coexistence with dementia is a difficult social issue.

However, at least, there is no reason that dementia is "shameful" and there should be no such bias.