I have serialized about human injuries before. Near the last round,

I have interviewed almost all private railway companies in Tokyo.

Except for one company,

"I was interrupted by all companies."

(*) Only one company has been reserved for reply, and has been left untouched for half a year unanswered. Other railroad company got me a polite messy e-mail, direct telephone.

-----

Well, I think that it is natural.

It can not be helped that an interview from the writer who had a series like this ,

will be content such as "difficult to answer", originally "there is no answer" naturally.

And, on the other hand, it is also natural that they come to fear

- If they speak formally, they will be criticized as "bureaucratic" as "procedural"

- If they talk about real intention, they becomes subjects to flames

-----

However, when I applied for an interview carefully,

"Let me talk about the railway system only when a human injury occurs"

However I was afraid that "still it was useless".

I, more than the general public, are familiar with "railway operation system", but now,

"On the contrary, it may be that it was not good," I think.