In advance of the lower house election next week, I am doing a preliminary survey of

"People's Examination of the Supreme Court Judges"

not Lower House election candidates

So far, I've explicitly disbelieved ("x") everyone, because I protested the "institution" of this election (It will be confident unless stated).

However, this time, for me, it is temporarily rising a trust in the Supreme Court judge by "illegal final judgment of GPS investigation".

If it keeps going like this, I'm afraid I may trust all of them.

In conclusion, I am easy.

Just like people who started to favor the New Party who stood up just before the public notice, with "Standing against constitutional amendment" and "withdrawing security legal system", after embarrassing appearance of the new opposition party.

However, I feel that it is close to "lonely height hero" or "judge patronage".

Apart from that.

-----

I come to read the Supreme Court decision sentence recently, when I was investigating "300 day problem" and "national election constraint correction problem" etc,

And this sentence is quite easy to read.

They have put together the issues of conflict and concluded that the ruling and the reasons leading up to that decision have been developed logically.

I do think,

"The sentence of the Supreme Court is a treasure trove of samples of technical writing"

At the same time, I come to see "which point did they get away from?"

It is probably because they can not manage society well if we do thoroughgoing theory. Of course it will also be for self-protection.

When I was attending law school seminar (private school), and hear the story of

"The aim of the trial is not the realization of justice, but the search for a trade-off of real compromises"

I felt like scales fell from the eyes.

-----

In conclusion,

"If I frequently read the judgment sentence of the Supreme Court, somehow, I will want to trust them."

the above law seems to be made at least in my mind.