(Continuation from yesterday)
"Friends or the class have no value. It is not necessary that you are worry about such things around you."
"If I feel pain for your loneliness, I will have saved you perfectly until your graduation. Of course I will forget you after graduation quickly.
Are there teachers who can tell this phrase to their students tightly?
As a parents, I always tell my children them.
-----
"You don't have to be ruled by something which are named "harmony" or "friendship based on a suitable turn shuffled properly."
I think that they should teach the above to their students for the first time.
It is mysterious.
All adults should know that
"The number of people are almost becoming zero after the graduation."
(To be continued)
I also have lived in the OT and IT field for long time,
whenever I hear the phrase, "I will transmit that concept to the world"
I think
"Well, that is a heavy burden for you"
-----
I don't want to deny the "transmitting concept" itself.
Sharing a concept is to share sense of values, and to indicate the direction to go. it is inevitable in order to operate the state and organizations.
However, a human being who is able to "transmit a concept" need some qualities, for example.
Attract people charisma, celebrity, a government or a world-wide economy company.
------
For example, even if a underling only engineer ,like me, try to "transmit a concept", who wants to hear the message seriously?
Needless to say, it must be impossible absolutely. That cannot be helped.
No great performance, no special ability and no attractive thin, such a dwaft engineer, like me,
still, if I think I want to send something to the people,
"Creating a real object, indicating the object works and proving the correctness of my design"
or
"Using the actual data, analyzing a lot of annoying data and proving my hypothesis"
In fact, there is nothing what I can do except for the above.
-----
So, I am doing them the day-to-day my best.
(The themes are fertility rate,diet, and suicides, anyway I can accept it is pretty pale contents.)
However it is utmost in my ability.
The phrase of "I will transmit the concept to the world", which is Overachiever to burn with shame,
The other might say the backbiting "Ebata? This guy is really stupid isn't he," and I cannot say only just one word for a timid person like me.
-----
Just walking around the net, finding unpleasant articles, criticizing them in the dirty words, no contributing to problem-solving, and they are all left as own messages,
Even if I were such unfortunate human beings, I think I will still be better not to say "I will transmit the concept to the world"
In advance of the lower house election next week, I am doing a preliminary survey of
"People's Examination of the Supreme Court Judges"
not Lower House election candidates
So far, I've explicitly disbelieved ("x") everyone, because I protested the "institution" of this election (It will be confident unless stated).
However, this time, for me, it is temporarily rising a trust in the Supreme Court judge by "illegal final judgment of GPS investigation".
If it keeps going like this, I'm afraid I may trust all of them.
In conclusion, I am easy.
Just like people who started to favor the New Party who stood up just before the public notice, with "Standing against constitutional amendment" and "withdrawing security legal system", after embarrassing appearance of the new opposition party.
However, I feel that it is close to "lonely height hero" or "judge patronage".
Apart from that.
-----
I come to read the Supreme Court decision sentence recently, when I was investigating "300 day problem" and "national election constraint correction problem" etc,
And this sentence is quite easy to read.
They have put together the issues of conflict and concluded that the ruling and the reasons leading up to that decision have been developed logically.
I do think,
"The sentence of the Supreme Court is a treasure trove of samples of technical writing"
At the same time, I come to see "which point did they get away from?"
It is probably because they can not manage society well if we do thoroughgoing theory. Of course it will also be for self-protection.
When I was attending law school seminar (private school), and hear the story of
"The aim of the trial is not the realization of justice, but the search for a trade-off of real compromises"
I felt like scales fell from the eyes.
-----
In conclusion,
"If I frequently read the judgment sentence of the Supreme Court, somehow, I will want to trust them."
the above law seems to be made at least in my mind.
Recently several types of harassment are entering the picture, and bit by bit, the concept of
"a harassment to compel anime and comics to juniors and others"
seems to be appearing.
This is called "content harassment" for the sake of convenience here ("Conhara")
Such harassment has hitherto been found in various fields ranging from books, songs, TV dramas to personal computer tools.
Everyone has a desire to "like their favorite things and share topics".
It is normal to think that they want to reach "sharing of topics" and "sharing of values".
-----
However, the root of this content harassment is, like
"He / she just does not know this work. As long as they know it, they surely like it"
a strong belief.
Moreover, the troublesome point of this harassment is that,
"Actually, there is a case that they come to like the content"
and,
"That possibility is not so low"
-----
On the other hand, the evaluation of a work (content) may change, at that point of contact with the work,
their age, degree of their knowledge and preference, reading comprehension, era background, even by weather and season,
The range of conditions that seems to be "the best!" is extremely narrow, and it is a rare case that the values will be shared by multiple people.
To be clear, the concept of "masterpieces for all people" is an illusion.
(Actually, I am a human who thinks that 90% of works of writers of Meiji and Taisho period are "fucking")
(To be continued)
(Continuation from yesterday)
The other day, my senior daughter said to me
"The life-style you have said
"Be crazy for what I want"
or
"Be too crazy to notice what I am crazy"
is
for just those chosen, isn't it?"
Then I thought
"Eventually she noticed that"
-----
She is right.
My know-how is just a "wet refuse" for others.
Though I can tell others my "career options" or "life style" from my previous experiments, I am afraid that they cannot help anyone.
Ultimately, a useful know-how on their own , should be found by themselves.
And, after remodeling the know-how into another know-how on their own, it becomes "useful"
Others know-how or advice are just trial samples.
-----
I give the above sermon to you just now.
So I hope you to think that what I talked in several days is just a trial example.
I'm currently teaching (super-fast) C, Go language and JavaScript to my junior daughter due to an urgent project that has arisen.
Of course, you know well that "Python" is the way to go for beginners in programming.
I am well aware of the insanity of making a beginner take a course in "C language".
-----
This is being done at the request of my junior daughter.
However, in order to complete the course by the prescribed deadline, I can only teach "my native language".
-----
Therefore -- this is not "abuse",
but "education"
Please don't call the police.
I wrote about "soldiers respect poor but fast speed" before, but it seems to have been different from the content.
The meaning of "poor but fast speed" here does not seem to be "just go fast, even if it's poorly done.
The correct meaning, in a nutshell, seems to be ...
"Fight "only" if you can win in a short time. Otherwise (if it's likely to be a long time or you don't know if you can win), don't fight"
-----
However, this is very difficult.
Research and development (R&D) is fatally time-consuming and costly, and researchers who fail to develop new weapons (new technologies) may have their raison d'etre questioned.
If I can develop a "winning technology" in a short period, I will have no trouble.
In other words, when it comes to R&D, if I think of "soldiers respect poor but fast speed" as Sun Tzu interpreted it, it becomes synonymous with "I do nothing/can't do anything".
-----
Anyway, it is not good to leave misunderstandings, so I will correct the contents of my previous diary.
I take down "soldiers respect poor but fast speed",
"There's nothing Ebata can do about it, except to be 'too quick'."
I'd like to change it to that.
As I continued yesterday,
As for the Metaverse, at this point, I don't know... I didn't expect a "chat" to come, and in such a form and at such a time.
-----
I am currently part of two organizations, both of which contact me via Microsoft Teams chat.
So, I have two computers up and running, waiting for both sides, always on standby.
I hate social networking service that abuse anonymity, and I have stopped both Facebook and Twitter expect for LINE for my family. I didn't expect to get involved in "business" and "academics"
I know the following with using this chat system,
- Chat within a well-governed organization (no anonymity at all) is very useful
- Ideal for multitasking, as you can have another small meeting going on in parallel with the meeting
- Materials can be distributed and shared in real time, allowing meetings to proceed in a focused manner.
Moreover,
- Cost-effectiveness of "Good" button for "Good" response
-----
The Corona disaster -> remote work -> remote meetings -> the rise of chat tools such as Teams (and the decline of email at the same time) has led to this.
Even if remote work becomes less common in the future and we return to F2F meetings, chat tools will continue to be used.
-----
Chat tools already existed as early as 1990 (e.g., "IP Messanger"), but they were little more than "toys".
After all these different paths, now, here we are, looking at a chat tool that has been perfected as a business tool.
_ "No wonder my future predictions are off"
I become defiant with saying that.
"I didn't realize how hard it would be to cook a meal daily."
My eldest daughter has been home for a long time and is complaining.
I think, 'I guess so.
It differs from cooking a dish you want to eat when you remember it, like I do.
A person who complains about the food that has been prepared should be interpreted as 'offering to take over the task of preparing the food.
Well, let's put that aside.
-----
Daughter: "I should have had more basic cooking skills and a better variety of dishes."
Me: "No, that's not true. All tasks, including cooking, can be done on-the-job training (OJT) depending on the situation."
Daughter: "But I don't have the basic skills, so moving up from there is hard."
At first glance, it seems that we are talking about teenagers' "examinations," but the topic we are talking about is "cooking.
Me: "Yes, I also regret that I had so many part-time jobs, such as "cram school" and "tutoring" when I was a college student.
Daughter:"?"
Me: "I should have had many more part-time jobs in small set menus and restaurants where I was allowed to use pans and pots." I should have learned more about the art of "cooking."
I would later realize how important it was to have a skill level in common home cooking.
' Can you make a dish with only the shabby ingredients left in the fridge? This seems to be important regardless of gender.
-----
However, it isn't easy to judge whether this is important since many packaged meals (bento boxes, frozen foods, etc.) are available these days that are delicious and easy to prepare, with good nutritional balance.
However, what is clear is that 'packaged meals are expensive.
In light of my future retirement, etc., our family's life can't be easier.
"Can you make one dish for 50 yen?". We must be trained and prepared to keep saying "Yes.