With the death of the president of a company that trains idols and offers them to the market, his "sex crimes" have been revealed -- I will refer to them as "sex crimes" because the term "sexual assault" does not feel right to me.

It is often said that if a person in power does not die, the crimes of that person in power will not come to light.

Because to defy them during the lifetime of those in power puts one's social or physical survival at risk.

However, the dead authority is not otherwise disadvantaged, only disgraced.

Only the victims are left behind.

-----

There are many worlds where not only those in power but also those in authority have to die before they can move.

One of these is the scientific community.

Science is a process of hypothesis, experiment, verification, and evaluation, which seems to have nothing to do with the secular world, but this is not so.

The ones I know of, geocentric theory, evolution, quantum mechanics, and the cosmic Big Bang theory, can be raised.

It is challenging for someone considered a significant expert in their field to advocate new theories unless they have died.

"If you go against the landlord's opinion, you will be hung out to dry in that field."

and

"If they dry up, they won't be able to eat."

If Darwin had not been an unearned (rich) man who fed on his parents' wealth, the theory of evolution might never have been published to the world.

Even science, whose "selling point" is "objectivity," is this secular.

It is no wonder that people in the entertainment field are disciplined by those in power.

-----

Well, if one asks what is the significance of revealing the actions of those in power who continued to commit such sexual crimes daily and thoroughly criticizing them, I think

"Preventing the creation of a second authority who does the same (uses privileged position to repeat sex crimes routinely)"

Let me put it in one word.

-----

Well, that aside, I have no idea why a corporate entity that had such a routine sexual predator at its head is still in existence.

Normally, I think the only option is 'voluntary closure of the business' by the corporate body itself -- am I missing something?