I believe that the art of making things is a kind of insurance policy, and I have always tried to keep up with the latest trends in technology (even if I skip company work).

And now, I am truly astonished to read this.

"I watched something scary"

It is like that.

-----

I think that even if you are not a engineer, you still need "technology," but that technology should be mainly based on the existence of human beings--communication, charisma, sales talk, charisma, and so on.

Is that perception itself already misguided?

For example, in my case, I have a vague expectation that even if I am thrown out of the company tomorrow, I will be able to get by with a computer.

I also believe that if I read the manual, I will be able to run most machines.

This is what I consider a "technology of making things" and "a kind of insurance" that does not presuppose human existence.

-----

I know that in recent years, urban design, community service, and community revitalization have been popular -- however, I think, that

"Something you've designed doesn't start working without hardware, program, database, and smartphone."