Last month, I was busy practicing a presentation and question and answer session in preparation for my junior daughter's interview.

In my opinion, when it comes to presentation, I think

"Even if your brain is straight, you can hit the lines into your body until your mouth is talking."

The presentation time remained unknown, so I had her give her 1-minute, 2-minute, and 3-minute presentations 10 to 20 times each, and repeated them thoroughly for the last two days, about three hours.

As for the question and answer session, I asked as many times as I could think of "malicious," "difficult to answer," or "cannot answer."

At the interview, I think, "If you get stuck in words and make silence for 3 seconds, you lose."

However, I don't think it is desirable to simply say "I don't understand."

-----

For answers to questions,

"I can't answer at this point, but I think I can clarify it by studying the field of XXXX in the future."

"For the current question, for example, if I could add the condition XXXX, I think we can use the existing method called XXXX."

In this way, you don't say "I don't know" but you can change the phrase in a positive direction or with a certain hypothesis

-----

In two days, I thoroughly taught these "adult" skills to my junior daughter.

I think this is unfair compared to other examinees.

It is the privilege of the protected person (child) to utilize the skills of the guardian (father).