Members of Parliament have the right to not have to be held accountable for what they say (criminal and civil penalties ) is guaranteed (Article 51 of the Constitution).

Our nation's highest-ranking decision-making council, the "Diet" (or more accurately, the council that makes laws), is notorious for its horrible field trips.

As you know, the sexual harassment relationship is particularly bad. From my point of view as an engineer, I sometimes think that the misunderstanding of technology (not "historical perception" but "technological perception") is terrible.

Nevertheless, I think Article 51 of the Constitution is a very important rule.

-----

I did some research and it seems that there is no provision for official language in parliament.

If this is the case, then members of the Diet do not have to speak "Japanese" in the Diet.

It doesn't matter what language you speak.

Nevertheless, if it's not Japanese, if it's a language that has been adopted into the "compulsory education" of "our country" and has been studied for at least 6 years and up to 12 years, then from a socially accepted perspective, I think it's okay to be allowed to use that language.

Then, by the Chairman's authority,

"Right now, I'm going to change the language from Japanese to English"

I think they can declare that.

At the very least, there doesn't seem to be any law that makes this illegal.

How about if the yapping is so bad that the Speaker can declare a change in the official language, when the decency of the parliament has deteriorated.

I think that this one rule - even if we don't invoke that declaration - would drastically reduce the number of people yapping in the field.

Because if the person who is yapping is suddenly silent, he or she should be ashamed of themselves.

-----

Article 51 of the Constitution shall be observed. The dignity of Parliament would be kept. Moreover, a strong incentive for the Japanese to teach English would be provided.

I would like to ask you to consider this.