(Continuation from yesterday)

I have one question.

Nobody knows that I stop the system.

Nobody in the world can confirm it .

It may be that "I didn't stop it".

That means,

"What is the difference of my claims between "I stop the system" and "I don't watch the picture"?"

These two claims are not treated as the same.

However I also don't feel so unpleasant for her opinions.

"Why I did so ?"

-----

What I came up is Article 29, Paragraph 1, Item 2 (*) of the Patent Law.

(*) "Public implementation" in the same item means that the invention is implemented in a situation where an unspecified number of people can know the content of the invention.

The claim "I will not watch" is that "I can't say "I can't watch". (although it's a little confusing).

On the other hand, the claim "I stop the system" is "I can say "I can't watch"".

In other words, for the same person (although there is a difference in reliability), the trustworthiness changes depending on the contents to be implemented.

Let me see, the analogy of thinking is similar to the story of Bayes' posterior probability (my favorite).

(To be continued)