The other day, I wrote the diary about "The TV at the living room had not worked, and after that the parts of function has recovered by a cool air from of an air conditioner"

One of the un-recovered function by the air conditioner, is

"Only NHK(surface wave) is not displayed"

To be precise, the trouble is "Scrambled video displays and nothing sounds in the NHK channel"

Now we dispute NHK's fees for television viewers, so I think that this un-recovered function gives me rise an interesting problem.

-----

You know, The Ebata's pay for NHK's fees for television viewers.

The reason why the Ebatas pays is that we watch the NHK programs based on a "benefit principle".

Well at the present, both NHK and the Ebatas cannot go the "benefit principle" by getting a new TV.

I think that it corresponds to "the installation of the television receiver" in the broadcast law, but it is the situation where I can not watch any NHK program completely.

I don't know how we should manage the fee in the eye of the law.

I hope you will give me whether the Ebatas should pay for the fee about the device that cannot receive NHK contents at all, liability without fault.

The other day, I wrote the diary about "The TV at the living room had not worked, and after that the parts of function has recovered by a cool air from of an air conditioner"

One of the un-recovered function by the air conditioner, is

"Only NHK(surface wave) is not displayed"

To be precise, the trouble is "Scrambled video displays and nothing sounds in the NHK channel"

Now we dispute NHK's fees for television viewers, so I think that this un-recovered function gives me rise an interesting problem.

-----

You know, The Ebata's pay for NHK's fees for television viewers.

The reason why the Ebatas pays is that we watch the NHK programs based on a "benefit principle".

Well at the present, both NHK and the Ebatas cannot go the "benefit principle" by getting a new TV.

I think that it corresponds to "the installation of the television receiver" in the broadcast law, but it is the situation where I can not watch any NHK program completely.

I don't know how we should manage the fee in the eye of the law.

I hope you will give me whether the Ebatas should pay for the fee about the device that cannot receive NHK contents at all, liability without fault.

The other day, I wrote the diary about "The TV at the living room had not worked, and after that the parts of function has recovered by a cool air from of an air conditioner"

One of the un-recovered function by the air conditioner, is

"Only NHK(surface wave) is not displayed"

To be precise, the trouble is "Scrambled video displays and nothing sounds in the NHK channel"

Now we dispute NHK's fees for television viewers, so I think that this un-recovered function gives me rise an interesting problem.

-----

You know, The Ebata's pay for NHK's fees for television viewers.

The reason why the Ebatas pays is that we watch the NHK programs based on a "benefit principle".

Well at the present, both NHK and the Ebatas cannot go the "benefit principle" by getting a new TV.

I think that it corresponds to "the installation of the television receiver" in the broadcast law, but it is the situation where I can not watch any NHK program completely.

I don't know how we should manage the fee in the eye of the law.

I hope you will give me whether the Ebatas should pay for the fee about the device that cannot receive NHK contents at all, liability without fault.