(Continuation from yesterday)

However, once the method has been disclosed, the software that has prepared the method may be deleted and another method may be installed.

As each government, if the spy activity can be monitored, it is better to use it conversely.

From that point of view, it is natural to make the specific method non-disclosure.

On the contrary, I think that if there is an organization or an individual who does such a thing, any government wants to stop it even if I apply pressure.

To begin with, this problem seem to be "cyber spy war", but the essence is the "war" that the United States government launched against the Chinese government.

This war, from the old days, is a the US folk art.

By the way, do you know the term of

"Super 301"

-----

It is a US law that was created with the aim of "targeting Japan" as "retaliation" to the import / export imbalance with the United States.

The law was enacted in 1988 to strengthen Article 301 of the US Trade Code (in 1988, it was a time-limited law, but it was revived in 1994).

Of course, our country has been defeated since the 1945 Pacific War. we made a national policy of "do not fight" against any war set up by the United States.

At this time, the government and the private sector cooperated to implement self-regulation of US exports and avoid a trade war with the United States.

It is a matter of course that "to hesitate with the opponent we can not win."

However, at this time, the United States also destroyed various "industrial innovation" in Japan.

As far as I know, development of space technology, super computer and computer operating system were listed as targets.

You might think "even if we cannot export the things to the US, we can buy the things in Japan", however, the activities of the law had another aspect.

A high-pressured selling for American-made products that works as a remedy for trade imbalances

For example, if Japanese satellites, supercomputers and operating systems are "pushed" in Japan, Japanese products will not sell in Japan.

Naturally, companies will not invest in R&D into products that can not sell, and the industrial innovation"will be crushed.

(To be continued)