The story of the NHK text "100 minutes de masterpiece" is amazing-what has been said.

Recently I read the text of Immanuel Kant, Jos Ortega and Gasset Baruch De Spinozaand , but I am surprised by the feeling that "I understand it like "that water sucks into the sand".

I could not understand them at all in my 10's and 20's. So I am wondering why I can do.

My hypotheses are

(1) Above all, the NHK text "100 de masterpiece" is amazing

(2) Over time, I have experimented some of the examples in the philosophy book

I could make another hypothesis that "reading of philosophical books for young people is "a waste of time",if the hypothesis of (2) above is "true".

-----

By "100 minutes de name book (not original book)", I learned that the study of philosophy is extremely logical and developed them based on thorough skepticism (eg, "they did not believe in human goodness at all. Roughly speaking, based on "human malice")

And, they proposed a system to operate society by assembling and turning those "malice" well.

I thought that philosophers were designers of social systems by controlling human('s parameters), not bridges, roads, tax systems or laws.

However, although there are no quantitative evaluations or demonstration experiments except for hypotheses.

(To be continued)