(Continuation from yesterday)

Foreign residents, as vulnerable groups, are more important people worth protecting, than seniors and children.

It will make clear if "neighborhood associations(NA) are security system for vulnerable groups" is right.

If they do say,

"Residents live in Japan, should user the mother-tongue"

they are to be said

"Most of residents can use "IT", so "IT" should be used for anyone, anytime and anywhere"

Because the above two are obvious "double standard".

-----

My idea, in the last page of the column,

"Local community management provider"

the business will chance of succeeding, I think.

It will be explainable that the NA cost is not fee of membership but contract rate.

The ghost of "community spirit" that can not be quantified or measured cost-performance is worse than ""Principle of service beneficiary burden"

That is natural for me.

Though it is unclear whether the neighborhood association service pays on a commercial basis, I think it will be on a profitable basis, by limiting the content of the service to "IT" and "Disaster Information Infrastructure".