(Continuation from yesterday)

People who have never used e-mail do not know the convenience of e-mails, so no motivation to use e-mails will occur.

So, people who do not use e-mail are not bad separately.

(So, only people (that is, me) who mange the organization by using e-mails will be unilaterally stressed)

----

So, changing the point of view, "Does it give 800 times inefficiency ?" Is not this a problem? Let me verify.

For example, considering only the organization "company (company)", you will be fully responsible.

- No early decisions are made and actions can not be advanced until the next meeting.

- To people who can use e-mails, they must force unnecessary communication methods (telephone, visit)

It can be said that it is "disadvantageing companies", it is no exaggeration to say that "there is no qualification of the members of the company"

Initially, at a joint consultation meeting of company re-employment, the attendees is said that

"That is the exit door for people who cannot use WORD, EXCEL"

Companies such as those who can not use e-mails, they probably do not even make assumptions.

----

However, the NA is not a company.

It is a volunteer organization, to facilitate communication among residents, to provide safety and security to residents, to activate the town, and to provide better regional services (various, regional festivals etc).

- It is not reasonable to bring such a company's operation policy

- Analog operation with long time constant is the communication platform in town

- In addition, the neighborhood association thinks socially vulnerable people as top priority

- Therefore, such an inefficient mode of operation should be prospectively approved

Do you think "this me" would say?

(To be continued)