(Continuation from yesterday)

Reading bulletin boards in the Internet, there are many case of "clamping "burden of proofs" against a opponent", especially using by short messages (like Twitter). Sterile arguments happen and resource of time are

"Why do I have to prove the logic that you claim?"

"you are stupid, are you?"

In such a scene, I have witnessed many times.

I do not pretend to afford such things as saying "I do not care" or "This guy are really a fool".

I think that these are obediently "unpleasant" and are calmly "furious".

Anyway, before we teach elementary school children 'English' or 'program', I think that "principle of burden of responsibility" should be taught thoroughly.

-----

However, if this principle is thoroughly done,

- People who are not competent enough to develop "reason" will be forced to silence

Opportunities are lost. for example, "Somehow disagreeable" or "I do not understand easily" or "I can not explain it but I feel uncomfortable"

- Based on "reason", we will definitely work advantageously on the authority / power side

The power side is good at using "reason", has the amount of information, and falsify data be easily (we could make them clear about Moritomo Gakuen incident)

The problems also occur easily .

I think this is going to be a "society feels stuffy" with this.

-----

I can not think of a means to solve this clearly.

So after all

"We should understand what I can not understand"

That leads to the conclusion.