In yesterday's diary I wrote "Dark future for people who can not use PC".

For such a future prediction, some people try to argue in the story that "interactive AI should be needed...".

Of course I also expect "interactive AI".

I think that "Google Home" etc. is a big step toward this future.

I am serializing the column of "AI's dark future", however I believe that future persons will read my column and make me laugh as "stupid pessimist" after ten and twenty years.

That is the most wonderful future.

-----

However, I think that there is a big lie in this "why, interactive AI ...".

Initially, AI technology is a mass of logic.

AI technology can not do anything for things or humans of "logic failure" (e.g extralogical complainer) that can not be logically matched.

I can understand the feeling "That is a significance of existence of AI isn't it ?"

But, in that case - you see, here is very important -

AI technologies must logically analyze the logic of that "logic failure"

(To be continued)