I am relatively fond of writing patent specifications (although it is troublesome).

However, it is not enough for a company engineer's invention to satisfy mere patent requirements (Patent Law 29).

It is still difficult to become a patented invention satisfying three internal requirements (profitable, defendable, shootable).

-----

"North" is always helping me in preparing patent specifications.

"North" gives me some tips as follows,

- What is the optimal transportation method to evacuate residents in the shortest time, when "North" attacks a nuclear power plant in Japan.

- What are the more efficient actions to be done for residents, after detecting the missile launch of "North", and assuming that the impact point could be estimated in a few second.

For example, how to stopping train service, how to notify the most robust building as a shield against explosion impact by vector calculations.

- What measures can make a stand-alone computer a substitute for infrastructure, if "North" virtually destroys the infrastructure system in Japan by stratospheric nuclear explosion.

and so on.

-----

When these means are described as patent specifications,

I change the part of "North", with

- "Nuclear power plant meltdown accident"

- "Large-scale Earthquake Notification from Earthquake Warning System"

- "Large scale network failure"

With these descriptions, the part of "invention subject" in the patent specification will be completed.

(To be continued)