(Continuation from yesterday)

I also think that it is important that we should not make them "virtual lawmaker".

The election will not be "virtual election". The campaign posters will be opened as usual, but the candidate doesn't have to show his/her figure or name. (They can use an animation character based on a license agreement).

- The poster shows illustrated commitments

- the candidate doesn't have to do a public speaking, alternatively is permitted to write a URL or QR code on the poster, and to show their speaking as an avatar.

They will be elected as a politician by normal election and vote system.

They also are permitted to join the congress with their avatar by a electronic conferencing system.

However,

I feel in my bones that a government by "virtual politician" is going to "popularism" easily.

Moreover, this mechanism might produce a lot of corrupted lawmaker, who are likely to resign readily.

"Government" should be managed by "logic" by nature. However, it can work by "implicit signaling","emotional ties", "threat" and "heartstrings" eventually.

-----

I have already experienced a big setback about the virtual world construction.

I've been engaged in research on Internet infrastructure, with the belief that "the Internet can realize a better society by valuable and global discussion".

However, I am summarising that this philosophy is "betrayed" or "failed" completely.

"Have I tried hard to make such an ugly and irresponsible Internet society?"

Honestly speaking, I feel sense of labor.

-----

Politics using the Internet may be more ugly and worst.

"Virtual politicians" may be destroyed in no time.

Still, the only thing I can say is that,

In a society where even "virtual politicians" can not be realized, there is no reason to realize "politics by AI".