(Continuation from yesterday)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Part 2) Criticism that "the view of the world such as an existing work (animation) is destroyed" is forfeiture

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This criticism may be justifiable if that animation will be out of print or never be able to be watched again, by making an animation live-viewing,

However, intangible assets will not decrease, but increase.

The animation will not disappear, so it must be an unreasonable claim of That (world of anime) is harmed"

I know well that,

the person who says such an unreasonable claim,

"cannot put up with the spread of this content to the world in a world view other than what they understood" -

And the behavior of such people, paradoxically, is appealing to the world.

"I am a small-minded person, who cannot recognize a diverse view of the world derived from one content work",

To be more extreme,

"I think that I can kill a human being who does not believe in the God of Allah, or even Muslims, who do not strictly adhere to Islamic teachings"

I think that they are coming out that that "root" is the same with that Islamic fundamentalist terrorists.

(I usually call these people "contents fundamentalist".)

(To be continued)