(Continuation from yesterday)

However, I don't deny the existence of "only one".

ecause, I know there is a "only one" person I have never met before.

All I can say is that

When a people want to aim to be "only one", the people fail to become "only one"

-----

There are several respectable "only one"s around me.

However as far as I know, they don't know that they are "only one". Moreover they don't aim to be "only one".

All they do is what they want to do, and they never give up doing what they want to do.

They never give up what they want to do, they do on their own, and they arrive at the goal "in result". That's all.

In addition, they don't have any idea of "they are in competition with others".

-----

I know the above thought is only my personal observation, however, we can share the same thought with you by observing behavior of winners of Nobel prize(physics and chemistry fields).

Many of the winner, often said "I could breathe a sigh of relief, because I think I can continue my study for a certain time.

For them, The Novel prize is not a purpose of their carrier. It is like an allowance that makes them continue their study.(Maybe they don't need that)

At least, I could not find the winner who seems to be boasting by handing out the Nobel Prize.

They didn't aim to be "only one". They became "only one" when we noticed it.

This is my own definition of "only one", however I believe this is correct.

(If you have time, please read it too)

In conclusion, I hope that you could understand that the phrase of

"Only one" than "Number on"

is thoroughly stupid.

-----

For me, I want to say to a college fresh young.

"Feel hard alone on the edge"

"Struggle against your obstructions, and keep it running"

"I don't know the world think to you, only I will say "I love you like that"

I will keep saying, again and again.