(Continuation from yesterday)

Before, I wrote "number is a violence" in my diary.

To extend this issue, the phrase of

"Simulation is a violence of violences"

might be reasonable.

For example,

To argue against a certain number, we can also use numbers.

Moreover, to argue a result of simulation, we can find fault with parameters or physical model of the simulator.

This is despairingly difficult to do them for people who don't know programming well.

I am afraid that it is also difficult for me, and I could not understand a logic of programs of others and find defects or bugs.

-----

However, simulator sometimes annoys me .

The violence of simulation can reach people who has made the simulator.

If they want to tamper with data using remodeled simulator, on purpose, the remodeled parts begin to make an impact throughout whole simulator.

In short, simulators start to work beyond the reach of the producer's intention.

In fact, I had a lot of experiments that some of my simulators would destroy my hypothesis perfectly, though I was a producer of the simulators.

For example, for this hypothesis of "diet transient phenomenon", I tried the simulations with more than 100 times of parameters patterns, and I confirmed to fail to get reasonable results. After all I had to abandon this hypothesis.

(To be continued)