(Continuation from yesterday)

"Development of model base", "Digital twin" for example, they are called with several way, however they are "simulator".

Last month, I made a simple easy simulator for train injure. and I confirmed that

- "Delay time" is in promotion of recovery time of the train injure.

- "Amount of damager" is in promotion of square of recovery time of the train injure.

On second thought, this results are natural, however, in this case, after watchint simulator's output, I noticed them and, said

"I see"

As before, I simulated "predition of population in Jaoan next 100 years" and "predition of global warming". even there were a lot of predition data in the Internet,

I don't believe the specialist opinions but

I believe that I can understand the phenomenon deeply in making the simulator.

In order to make a same phenomenon in a computer, I have to embed bare minimum of parameter in the simulation. If not, the simulator doesn't start to work well, or put nonsensical values out.

On the contrary, I think that it is a proof that I can almost understand the phenomenon correctly if the simulator output reasonable values.

(To be continued)