Previously, I wrote about the novel "Brave New World" by Aldous Leonard Huxley.

This novel describe a kind of utopia based on the expanded eugenics theory (dystopia from the view of readers)

For example, the world makes three types of human by mechanical processes, and the lower level humans,

are generated as non-intelligent and labor-class human by gene abuse operation, and

are brainwashed that the heavy labor makes them happy.

In short, no unhappy person are in the novel.

-----

I am annoying if I can make a theory to deny the utopia society regardless of discrimination, humanitarian, and ethics.

I am afraid that if I don't, I also deny neither eugenics that was the basic policy of Nazi nor extinction of a specified race.

-----

When I asked my junior fellow a advice, he was saying

"What are you talking now, Mr.Ebata, of all people?"

He showed me the reasoning to deny the eugenics easily.

Today, I omitted the theory (because it is too long). In short, he made his point clear from the view of the meaning of "dominance".

"Oh, I got it!"

I could understand his drift of an argument perfectly, and the same time, I felt to regret to confess myself beaten.

-----

In addition him, there are a lot of junior workers in my office(laboratory) to try to deny my thought with using my previous theory.

In fact, hateful and cool guys, they are.