I am reading a law "Act on Regulation of Human Cloning Techniques", but I cannot understand the legislative points.

After the World War Two, any law has been supported to add the legislative purpose. Because whoever can understand it.

Unfortunately I can't understand it about this law.

-----

I can't understand the following phases in the Article 1.

"Safety for human life and body, and maintenance of public order"

Though I know that laws should be described as superordinate concepts in order to support many matters for wide fields, there should be some subordinate concepts at the beginning of constitution establishment.

I want know the points but I don't find them as of the moment.

-----

The following issues are in the book "medical ethics for nursing students".

- Prejudice and discrimination is promoted

- Problems in family and parent-child relationship

- Possibility that contrary to the natural order to human cloning

- Possibility perish caused in a position close to the slaves human clone

I think that the issues seem to be non-sense, and the writer also knows that.

-----

I think that the legislative points are "we don't understand the harmful at the present, so we prohibit the actions for the moment".

I think It is no problem.

For example, there seems to be no person who thinks that a life in a radio-active contamination area should be safe by danger decided.

I am sure that the person's feeling of "I don't like the Clone unconsciously" made this law.

(To be continued.)