When I released the column about "Hatsune Miku", I found a comment on the web board, that is "Ebata was just the company provocateur".

_ I made a small talk unconsciously.

"Are you really silly?"

-----

Who (especially "I") made profits, how, where on earth by my columns?

I would like the person to tell "Do you have a pea-brain?”

-----

The other day, when I calculated the birth-rate in Japan with blood in my eye, my daughter asked me

"Did you get jobs from the Japanese government?”

Um... it makes a sense.

If the research organization of the government asked me to speak for another about what they never open by themselves, my daughter's question might be natural.

But unfortunately, I think it might be opposite.

I am afraid that the research engineers got mad with me, because I pointed out the problems in the white paper about the declining birth rates strategies.

-----

First of all, it is almost a subside attitude that the hired engineer wrote the nuclear accident in detail.

But the reason why I keep writing such dangerous columns is to inform my wife and daughters the facts.

If they say "we don't understand the accident", their father should be used to investigate the reasons and processed of the accident.

-----

When I accepted the column job, I declared the followings,

I choose themes, and

Nobody interrupts my decisions.

The other hand, I don't care "company provocateur". If asked, I am going to write any column.

I am not a journalist, so I am not interested in the moral hazard of journalism.

(Honestly speaking, I want to meet such persons who ask me the column)

But I am a just engineer, so I don't write atheoretical documents. To be precious, I can't write them.

We, engineers, had been completed not to be able to write atheoretical documents at all.