Using a public library, I can save money not to buy a lot of books. But there is a problem of "write inhibit" in the book (to make sense). So I always buy secondhand books at the use book store.

Now, I am researching iPS cell from the view of the destructive methods against the system of interfere in birth.

So, recently I stock up on many books whose title includes "iPS", the other day, I got angry with the following issue.

-----

A book showed not "iPS" but the author's research fruits, despite of my intention.

I don't say "deceptive indication", but I think it is a moral principle that the main description should be "iPS cell" and the additional things might be his own results.

I could admit that the contents of the book are good. But the book is difficult for me to understand and I had to spend and WASTE long time of mine. So ―― I got mad with the book.

When I checked Amazon site, there are four good evaluation results.

I can't believe it.

I doubt if it might be organized vote.

-----

But this way, using title with attractive buzzword is my day-to-day situation.

I try to make my blog title attractive every day.

_ 。

Unfortunately I have no right to give names of my productions and the editor office authorities decide it. But I was always blamed for the title.

Anyway, both the author, the editor of the book and I are "birds of a feather".

If someone blames me saying "Ebata is no right to get angry with anything", what I do is only to leave nothing to become silent.