When I waited for the elevator cargo, an advertising display came into sight.

=================

Floor lady

More than 1800 Yes / hour

TEL XXX-XXXXXX

○○ shop

Daily payment

No norm. No taxi payment

=================

I think dimly that I have never made me a floor lady until now, and I am never going to be the lady in the future.

If I shout "this is gender discrimination, age discrimination and appearance discrimination (maybe)", I think that anybody put me out of court absolutely.

According to refusing to deal with me, I think that it is generally right that nobody assist me.

-----

In addition, I wonder

"Is this paradigm going to be permanence?"

Or

"Going to be variable with conventional wisdom?"

"Which is going alone?"

While I thought about such a thing, the door of the elevator opened.

The other day, I used "Text Mining Studio(TMS)" that is a text analytical engine ,owing from "NTT Data Analysis System Co."

and analyse the discourse in the 70 years since the end of World War II, of the sitting prime minister.

I was impressed with saying,

"I got it. Computer (actually TMS) thought that.

I have already read this "in the 70 years" at least three times carefully, this software could explain what I have felt odd in some measure"

Continuously, I also tried to analyses "in the 50 years" of then prime minister.In conclusion, I could find the difference between above the two, in some measure(To tell you the truth, I thought it was not so clear).

-----

If you are interested in the results, please let me know.

I will try to write it as a column, if you want to read it.

(Continuation from yesterday)

The physical phenomenon is

(1)Even if it is made by real video, the big psychological humanism criticisms will occur.

(2)In reality, repeats of the experiment with changing the conditions, are absolutely impossible,

(3)Nevertheless, it is difficult to explain a seriousness of the problem. without visualization.

and it is deeply relate to my serialized column at present.

I know what I did it about it is just to input some sample programs, and it might be doubtful that I can realize the above a simulation of the physical phenomenon.

I think "Let me see what I can do, anyway".

-----

When my wife and I had just got married (maybe),

(1)we started a game whose title was called "Dragon Quest" as I recalled, by a TV game machine, that borrow from my senior worker.

(2)After the 15 min, we stopped the game, saying "too much of a bother", and

(3)my total time I had spent for games, were about to less than 1 hour,

Such I, who has been not interested in any game,

can make three dimensional game (even if is very simple by sample programs)

I am really surprised at the reality.

-----

By the way, I cannot make a hero of the game arrive at the goal, in spite of self-produced game.

I tried the game more than 100 times, however all of the hero became dead.

I am saying to myself that "I am too much to have poor taste".

(Continuation from yesterday)

I am interpreting good faith. I believe that the persons who post these pictures as "memorabilia" for themselves, and remain on their own SNS, and there is no other intention except it.

"A picture of a meal" is the typical example.

Initially,

"Why do I take care of your food ?"

"SNS is bonds? You must not be sleepy"

People like me who think that, are not suitable for SNS.

As I develop this theory,

"Why do I care about your clothes ?"

"Why do I care about your enjoy being with a costume of a mouse character ?"

"Why do I care about the scene of your conference presentation ?"

And the target of "Why do I care about" is expanding, and the significance of existence of SNS collapses.

-----

"However now, Ebata, you. Every day you are updating my diary (blog)"

I heard the voice is coming.

"Is that the same as SNS? "

I think that I can clearly answer "different", if asked.

For me, I have no intentions of "I want to connect with someone", "I want to be committed", "I want to stay warm".

"I do not want to hear anyone's comments and I do not expect any feedback from anyone. I do not need cheering or criticism". I am keeping this diary with the stances.

In short, it is a

"street preaching"

(To be continued)

(Continuation from yesterday)

Whenever we should quarrel with others, we have to do it completely.

I think that any quarrel is good for mutual understanding.

However, the quarrel without "landing site" each other is the worst and the disgusting.

It is said that "a quarrel to compel an enemy" is the worst quarrel in the world.

A good quarrel is to make the enemy realize their win, but to win the quarrel.

In practice, there are a lot of theories and facts, for example, diplomacy, math(e.g game theory), psychology(e.g. behavioral psychology) and history( Germany from Treaty of Versailles to the start of World War II)

-----

Now I believe the government intelligences and reason.

(Though I don't believe people who speak hot words repeatedly as an anonymous by SNSs

I know that diplomacy is important, however, I also ask the government to work for a lot of internal affairs(e.g. work style reform) more.

-----

I had been aroused controversy based on a justice of my opinion.

I don't think that all of them are in vain, however, I think these actions are the worst from the viewpoint of cost effectiveness.

Many people, including me, will going not to lead a correct answer by a logic but to adapt our beliefs into logics.

I don't think that this way is not so bad, because if we don't have our beliefs, we could not get motivations for actions.

On the other hand, I also think that we have to "modify" or "change" our beliefs successively.

However, I am afraid that it is very difficult to modify or change our beliefs with hearing other's opinions.

Especially if the other is a person I hate, my belief is going to be enforced against the person's opinion.

So, I "don't hear opinions of others".

(To be continued)

Lately, I've been sleep-deprived and I've been trying to take a nap every so often.

The "dry cell" in my body is a very good performing one.

"I'll take a 10-minute nap and run for five hours straight"

This may seem like a good one, but it is the "cause of our bad insomnia".

-----

Yesterday, I set the timer for "10 minutes" and laid down.

I woke up with 8:34 to go.

I've only been able to take a nap for less than two minutes. However I was feeling better than I'd have experienced in recent years.

I thought it was odd, so I checked my watch.

The timer was set for "10 hours", not "10 minutes".

Lately, the food (bread, rice balls, and lunch boxes) that my junior daughter brings back from her part-time job has become my meal (lunch) as I continue to work alone at home.

"I'm already in the mood to be a care-receiver"

I can make a light meal if it's simple.

Ebata: "And what happens to the lunches that you don't bring back?"

Daughter:"The lunch will be discarded"

That's what made up my mind.

-----

I just can't get over the whole "throwing away food" thing.

Recently, there has been a boom in food loss, and I am trying to skip the process of peeling vegetables.

I mean, to begin with, "vegetable skins" are essentially "delicious".

My latest craze is to shove potatoes and carrots into curry without peeling them, and to use up all the leeks and spinach except for the sticky parts.

I eat apples whole because the skin part is delicious, and recently, my senior daughter taught me that biting into a whole pear is a good idea.

The food is both easy to cook and delicious.

Vegetables with skins, fruits with skins, please try them -- to begin with, the custom of "eating with the skin on" is a very recent (a few hundred years or so) and somewhat "conscious" trend.

Let's end such frivolous customs in this century.

Controversy seems to be erupting about the state funeral of former prime ministers, although not on the scale of 'dividing the country in two'.

I think the debate itself is a good thing, but I don't understand the the cost of state funerals.

"Cabinet approves expenditure of about 250 million yen for former Prime Minister Abe's 'state funeral'."

"Really, It's too cheap isn't it?" I thought.

A rich man's house, about the price of one.

-----

Because people at state guest level are coming to the country in large numbers.

Let's assume that 100 state guests arrive, and that 10 people are attached to guard them, and that the overheads per person are 500,000 yen per person per day, roughly, 5 million x 100 people = 5 billion yen. Of course, if they stay for two or three days, that's another 20 billion yen.

This time, the number of expected participants is announced to be 6,000.

Naturally, traffic and operational restrictions will be imposed, so local police officers will have to be mobilised and the prestige of the Japanese police force will be put on the line to provide security for dignitaries.

If a key figure is assassinated in the country, there is even a risk of a breakdown of diplomatic relations.

If you put all these together, I think it will easily break the 50 billion mark.

If. If I were to hold my own funeral for 6,000 people, I would need 10,000 yen per person, or 60,000,000 yen, for dinner, entertainment and travel costs.

Even this me.

-----

I am not going to quibble about 'amounts of money'.

However, as an engineer who is in charge of a serial column with figures, I would like to see an overview (items) of the "250 million yen" quotation at the earliest opportunity.

And then I wrote this far and found the phrase 'This does not include the cost of police personnel to guard the area'.

That would be.

We will now amend our request to "Disclosure of the estimate with security cos.

This is a continuation of yesterday's story,

"Does marijuana seem to work for exhausted business people who are not motivated to do anything?"

I would like to interview a certain university athletic department.

I am not being sarcastic or critical, but I am "serious."

-----

I don't plan to use it, but I hope that thinking 'there is marijuana on the last line will help me trudge through this situation.

It's OK.

If a salaryman uses marijuana, that is the end of a business person (it is illegal in Japan).

I am still rational enough to think I should quit my job before using marijuana.

I'm thinking about the possibility of 'going back to Colorado.'