Spring is the season of farewell.

Farewell parties are frequently held in this period.

"Collection of messages" are still alive.

-----

I always wrote true my mind in the "collection of messages".

Last year, for a person who changes the job, I wrote just one phrase,

"It will be trouble"

Really, I thought that there became a lot of troubles, and in fact, many troubles has happened.

"To prudently support my work, sometimes, to anticipate beyond my thoughts."

It is not popular for everyone to do such workpersonship.

So I have used the phrase just twice ever.

-----

So, I can say with confidence,

When I leave, nobody is going to write in the "collection of messages".

"It will be trouble"

In poor case, I am afraid that many person will try to write

"Happy", "survive"

Today, new my column is released, so I take a day off.

"Over the AI(9) ---- beyond a reach of our imagination of AI"

Compliant Artificial Intelligence - Repeat skillful questions to see in the heart

-----

To my wife, "You should absolutely get through with that person"

On the other hand,

To your mother-in-law, "You should absolutely break the marriage of your daughter"

the fortune-teller who said the above phrase to the mother and daughter

has existed

I have a slight pain in my lower back because of moving work of the departure.

The works are just to pack up in the same building, however the problem is PCs.

In my case, I am linking PC with geeky setting, so the system is difficult not only to disassemble but also re-build them.

Enough of that.

-----

At the time of change, I feel in q quiet.

"It is better to stop using name of newcomers and youth without an honorific title, and slighting them.

The reason is here. Please read through it.

While watching the article "The assault to the idol" of the news of the entertainment section of Google,

"After all, going to this accident"

I think that.

-----

The story changes a bit. I have read a memoir of men in an article before.

"Before the age of 30, I believed I could marry an idol."

At that time, I thought "How happy this guy is."

However, those who can not "watchthemselves objectively and can "make them crazy" by subjectivity

―― Only people like the above, can be "happy" in the present era.

-----

By the way, for me,

it is quite long for having been said "a happy person".

Today, new my column is released, so I take a day off.

Mr.Ebata's struggling for DIY IT Nursing Support System(4) "

Run! Raspberry Pi. Rescue your parents from stray cars

-----

In the last column, I did not disclose the contents of the code for Raspberry Pi, but downloaded it as a package.

Because of that, I was told, "There are almost no articles (code, etc.) on Raspberry Pi."

"So, this time, let's disclose all the codes"

I thought that.

And it is supposed to be ugly (the other reasons are that I explained all three systems at once.)

So, if you are not interested in Raspberry Pi or code, you can skip to p.6.

The "Dr.Shibata, the overrun" has appeared and is developing a sharp theory.

That aside.

-----

Many (engineers) reading this article do not have such a chance to try Raspberry Pi.

Then, "we can't go to the office / we can't let us go to the office" is now a chance for a thousand times (*).

(*)As of March 30, 2020, in order to prevent the spread of viral pathogens, local governments in downtown Tokyo have issued a request for residents to "stand by at home".

In an environment where your boss cannot watch you,

you can do it at home, and

It does not cost much,

You can study IT/OT technology

Such an opportunity may never come again.

If you can build and operate Raspberry Pi, you will not be able to know the "building" of AWS, but you will be able to do "operations" of AWS.

----

I feel like I'm still dreaming that I can use the UNIX-type operations I got when I joined the company.

The "dream" is a "nightmare".

Even now, I am honestly dissatisfied with the reality that UNIX-like operations are being used.

I thought that by 2020, the concepts of construction and operations would be gone, and that "artificial intelligence", "AI" would all do the job.

"Artificial intelligence", "AI", "artificial intelligence", etc. Really, they can't do anything. They are useless.

The reason why we must continue to use 1970 operations at the present, is that the basic architecture of computers has changed little after all.

-----

Well, anyway, if you miss this opportunity, you may not have the chance anymore.

In this virus disaster, time will surely settle down, anywhere to settle down.

But a vague "study" attitude will definitely fail.

Then, let's set the goal to "complete one application".

It doesn't have to be the current nursing care IT system, it doesn't have to be a raspberry pi.

How about AWS? There is a one-year free package, so you can use it.

-----

System construction and programming consume time stupidly.

It will let you experience several hours in about 30 minutes, and it is also the ultimate time-consuming (wasting) device.

You can shorten the time you feel stressed at home.

That's what I guarantee.

I know that the vaccine made by AstraZeneca uses chimpanzee cold virus.

However, I did not know that pig-derived ingredients were used in that vaccine.

(I don't know if this is true or not, but I'm going to assume it is true)

-----

But from a Muslim point of view, I think it's a big problem.

In fact, there seems to be a "halal controversy" in Indonesia.

The "pig adenovirus (if it is the same as the chimpanzee derived adenovirus)" here is just a "container" that carries the spike protein part of COVID-19.

If you ask me whether it can be discussed in the same as "pig-eating," I think scientifically I can say no.

However, to equate science with religion is basically a tirade that undermines human culture, history, and above all, the nature of faith.

-----

I took this opportunity to look into the reasons why Islam forbids "pig-eating".

There are various arguments, but I couldn't find one that explained it logically.

To put it bluntly, it seems to come down to "the Koran forbids eating pork" and therefore "not eating pork".

Well, I think that is tautology.

I also feel that this is a strategic point of view for Islam to differentiate itself from other religions.

(This is my own personal opinion, however) all religions are the same in that they are "after-death threat systems".

Therefore, the "no pork" policy is an easy differentiation point to understand.

Regardless of the controversy over whether AstroZeneca's vaccine is halal or not, The religion that has been advocating the "ban on eating pork" for some 1,400 years, since the early 7th century,

"will get the pig adenovirus to save their life"

I'm sure it would be very unpleasant for them to see that picture.

-----

I'm not interested in this "halal" debate even 1mm, but when it's my turn to be vaccinated, I'd like to request Pfizer's vaccine instead of Altrazeneca's (of course, we don't have a choice).

Just the thought of putting a computer-designed mRAN vaccine into your body is enough to make you swoon.

After all, I'm an IT engineer.

I was fortunate to receive a best paper award at an international conference this year.

I am so lucky that even now I wonder, 'Were I being cheated?

To be honest, I even thought that the paper would not even be accepted, let alone win the best paper award.

This is because I wrote this paper in the same style of the columns I usually write.

-----

In other words, it is a bare-bones description of anger, frustration, regret, problems, complaints, and claims that keep cropping up in the field, without going beyond the style of a thesis statement.

In a nutshell, the paper was like a "list of minefields for field trials," and was the culmination of a protest against "those who talk about 'field trials' so casually".

In hindsight, I think,

"Was that what they liked about it?"

The paper reviewer may have been someone who had seen 'hell' in a field trial.

If they are such persons, it is possible that they may have "emotionally accepted (adopted) the paper before examining the content carefully".

If I were a reviewer, I would do so(I assure you).

Therefore, if you are a researcher, I recommend that you try to write a paper that puts emotion not only front but also all.

-----

If possible, I strongly recommend writing in a language other than Japanese.

I know from experience that there will be fewer claims from various parts of the domestic.

I watched "Meltdown File.8 "Part 2: New revelations 12 years after the accident""

I guess I could call it "stupefaction".

I had to go through the experience of 'standing there, stunned, watching TV.

-----

I will summarize the gist of this program in three roughly different points.

(1) The water supply to the reactor that the firefighters literally "risked their lives" for accelerated the meltdown.

(2) "Venting" to reduce reactor pressure "should not have been done" at that stage

(3) However, (2) above caused the reactor pressure to drop, resulting in water being pulled up from the water reservoir, which was completely unexpected, and consequently cooling the dissolved fuel.

In other words -- the "best" choice at the time "led to the worst," and that "worst prevented further worsts" as a result.

For me, the biggest shock was, that,

"The situation that proceeded on its own, and then stopped on its own, completely beyond the intentions of the people controlling the system"

It is no exaggeration to say that this is a 'total defeat' for the engineers who control nuclear power.

-----

It is said that the power companies and the universities to which they outsource the operation of nuclear power plants conduct every conceivable accident simulation.

I know that the stress of coming up with such an accident scenario prior to conducting the simulation is an unimaginably painful task.

However, real accidents easily overcome such a huge number of simulation assumptions.

-----

As I have said in the past, control systems, whether for automobiles, airplanes, power plants, or rockets, gradually improve their safety and reliability through repeated failures.

However, only "nuclear power plants" cannot use this major principle of control systems.

Because, the return on failure is huge.

"Twelve years after the accident, 20,000 people are still living in evacuation shelters"

This is, of course, the tragedy of the current situation, however,

"In the worst case scenario of this accident, all of eastern Japan would have been a no-go zone"

No one can deny this.

-----

So I come to the same conclusion as usual.

For patents outside Japan, each country's patent office will respond in that country's language.

Naturally.

As long as the patent is requested in that country, it is only natural that it should be written in the language of that country's executive branch.

But recently, they replied to me in English for European patents, etc. They are accommodating.

I don't like English, but I still feel like thanking them just because they are using English instead of the language of that government agency.

-----

The other day, the Chinese Patent Office notified me of the reasons for the refusal.

I thought about accepting the reason for rejection because it is in Chinese, but I also believe that is not a sincere response.

Unlike more than a decade ago, we now have excellent translation engines, so I think I will try to fight the Chinese patent office this time.

You must at least show a fighting pose in the first round -- in the name of "Ozenji's Patent Specification Manufacturing Device."

By the way, I am the only one calling the above (i.e., self-proclaimed).