I have a lot of younger co-workers who are rude and KY(Part.2).

This following is another extreme attitude.

Ebata:"Why did the power company, Minister of State for Measures for Declining Birthrate, and Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology complain to my columns? I have criticized their neglects so much."

Younger:"Hahaha. That's the way it goes. "

Ebata:"My I ask you the answer?"

Younger:"Ebata-san, you don't have name values at all, and your columns have no influential power against the world"

-----

In short, I can agree with his opinion certainly.

However,

"How do you think that you disrespect your senior to my face with such a comment?"

I think that too.

(Continuation from yesterday)

Now I am going to make "the torture system" destroy on purpose.

For example,

- About "division into small groups", I don't do anything and I make the teacher achieve managerial responsibility.

- For such an event, I declare absence, and I make a clear of the incompetence of the teacher.

But I could not do the above with lack of knowledge because of child.

I think that I am very sorry that I could not counterattack like even this level.

(To be continued)

Everyday, making a lot of materials annoy me.

Thanks to these annoying, however, I have had a detailed knowledge of the Microsoft Office applications.

I sometimes help my wife and daughters with editing their materials by the Powerpoint, and I always finish editing within a few minutes.

They seem look at me with surprise and sense of awe.

I cannot feel happy, because I don't want to make me a master of the Powerpoint.

However, in my company we are indicating our intention by the Powerpoint, neither Japanese nor English. It is natural that I have become "a wizard of the Powerpoint".

Communication using the Powerpoint, is very effect because it is possible to express our ideas with real objects, and very inefficient way to consume much time desperately.

Of course, expressing our ideas by pictures is one of the best way absolutely, you know, this way is accepted for patent application in public.

At the same time, this way also fit chicken minds of Japanese administrative position, because they cannot say "GO" without perfect understanding of subordinates idea.

When I think, that it is a way "O.K. I will give you a free hand to do, however if it won't work well, you become fired for being the failure."

Both are wrong.

Anyway, I want to pick up a hypothesis that the Powerpoint is accountable for "why we Japanese cannot realize shorter working hours"

-----

Above and beyond this

I don't think that "English is an universal language"

I don't want to say "we should use the Powerpoint" however, the best thing to do is to communicate with picture and character.

I heard the story for the question of

"Who set up Toudaizi-temple ?"

there was the teacher who gave the answer.

Unconsciously I believed that the person was a converted ex-leftist activist (just prejudice) or intercollegiate loser ex-rightist (terrible prejudice).

Above and beyond this.

------

I don't think that this answer could be wrong, however, in general "history" means "history" of "policymakers" and "wars". So this answer is not proper.

Above all, if the person wanted to derive this answer, he/she should give their student

"What kinds of technical problem were in building technology"

"What kinds of novel and invective invention were generated"

"What kinds of affect were given in in building technology history"

-----

In this case, the answer of "carpenters" means,

"Any building structure could be set up, if a power orders it"

"A naughty attitude towards technology and engineers could be observed"

I feel unpleasant.

(Continuation from yesterday)

As long as we live a life without conscious mind.

we are going to victimizers against any person who tries to accomplish something with strong will,

I come to think about the above, so I cannot enjoy television dramas.

-----

"Fight!" is a song title of "Ms.Miyuki Nakajima".

"Your song about fighting the world, is going to be laughed by people who don't try to fight anything"

All people, life you, others and I who listen to the song, are

"people who don't try to fight anything"

I think that it is very important for all of us to notice the reality.

-----

"People who are fighting" don't laugh about "other people who are fighting".

Because "people who are fighting" know pains of "people who are fighting"

For example, peole who don't (can't) open their original theory, work and writing to the world, and

only criticize others or the works by SNS and electronic bulletin board, with pretending a critic or a moralist,

are typical "people who don't try to fight anything".

(Continuation from yesterday)

My daughters sometimes ask me to listen to their problem, even when I am working in my room.

The "problem" is not beg me for money.

In my case, I always say "I will buy TX and RX devices of RTK system, even if I have money for you", and actually I have done it.

So they don't approach me with such a problem.

------

Changing the subject,

In the world, there are some strange fathers who "ask their daughter what she wants as a present, and buy and give it to her "

Even if I get reincarnated 100 times, I will not be able to be such a father.

My basic policy is "fight and get what you want by your own"

except for "safety","education", "self-development" and "troubles"

to return.

-----

My daughter's problems are relatively practical topics, for example "Cuban Crisis", "Proletarian Cultural Revolution" and "designer child".

If conditions permitted, I will write a report of homework for her.

I don't intent to pay for briefcase (called "branded goods") at all, however,

I can struggle jointly against a power harassment of teachers, who order a homework of nonsense mount and deadline.

"Slap the teacher in the face by "the report written by a professional research engineer""

and, I hand the report to her.

I am also asked by her to discuss abstract issues like, "career options" or "life style"

According to these case, I will tell her operative examples, which are, of course, within my previous experiments.

(To be continued)

I don't think it was a lot of fun when I looked at teenagers in general, except when I was in college.

Even if I become a celebrity and receive a lecture request from the high school I attended, I think I will definitely refuse.

There were two guys in high school who were bullying me, and I still remember their names, and I still don't forgive them. But that's not all.

After all, I had hated "school".

However, I loved "university", so I think that what I hated was

A "box" called "class"

-----

- "Management area" where it was decided that the teacher should clarify the scope of jurisdiction and responsibility, and the other management targets (students) could be ignored.

- "Cluster" that was forced to be gathered for no purpose, but is compared to other classes and forced to win for no apparent reason.

- Evil "classmates" who interfered with what I was doing and kept pulling my legs instead of cooperating.

-----

At this time of the athletic and school festival, I remember

"The classmate who took a group photo in front of the cultural festival exhibit that I made by myself after returning from the holidays"

Even now, decades after that, I can't forgive them.

-----

So, even if I become a celebrity and receive a lecture request from the high school I attended, I think

"I will definitely refuse"

The other day, as a project of the section, we were divided into several groups and tried to have a free discussion (no theme).

So, since there was a young guy (in his 20s) in the group, I asked him about "matching apps".

There are two main questions.

(1) Do you have any resistance to using a matching app?

(2) Is it possible to openly disclose the fact that you got married through the matching app?

At any rate, I am a person who has only heard about dating sites, which have caused many problems, and I have no plans to use matching apps in the future.

In other words, I am a person who is certain that I will not be able to experience matching apps in a real way.

-----

Well, the answers were : (1) no, and (2) not publicly.

This answer, while seemingly contradictory, makes a lot of sense to me.

This is what the "e-mail" of a science student on a college campus in the late 1980s looked like.

From the view of the history of e-mail, it will probably be a few more years before the use of "matching apps" can be spoken of publicly.

-----

The only thing I can say is that even if "matching apps" become a normal communication infrastructure, the situation will continue to be that 'people who can't fall in love or get married will always be unable to do so.

Matching is the provision of a "place" and the "exchange of value" there.

A match is made when there is a common understanding that "your value" and "the other person's value" are the same to be able to be exchanged.

In that sense, I guess.

"Matching "love" is hopelessly difficult"

and,

"Getting the "signal" to light up is hopelessly difficult"

I remembered that.

-----

"I don't know what I'm studying English or math for!"

To the children who shouted,

"Needless to say, "To become an adult who can have the options of a fulfilling love life and a happy married life." absolutely"

I think it is admirable for an adult to be able to say something like this outright.

Metaverse, will it come?

I have a lot of techs and trends that I used to say "It's coming!" but "It had not come", so basically I refrain from making statements.

I can only do so much "analysis".

Bitcoin, for example.

or "NFT"

-----

Whether or not "popular" in the world has little to do with the content of technology.

Of course, it is very easy to reason (analyze) after a "hit" or "miss".

However, I never win and make money.

-----

Even if it is metaverse or quantum computer, it is the best not to say something difinitively at the present.

After the trend have settled in, you will say,

'Actually, I knew that all along'

This way will make you cool.

I've seen a lot of people who say like that in the course of my work.

I am also one of them.

Therefore, it is easy for me to find such a person.

It is interesting to have a mystery about cryptography.

But I think many mysteries misunderstand the meaning of "code" -- something both authors and readers know, of course.

A cipher is a message that

(1) can only be carried in a way that is open to the entire world,

yet

(2) can only be decrypted by a specific person.

If the public message in (1) above contains the decryption hint in (2), the cipher cannot achieve its purpose.

Also, if it is something that can only be deciphered by the qualities (abilities) of the person, it is not a cipher because it is not a message to a specific person.

And if no one can decrypt it, it is not even a "cipher." It is just a string of characters.

In other words, in a strict sense, the ciphers that appear in novels, dramas, and movies are not 'ciphers.

-----

I am watching a digest of the drama "Not to Mention Mystery" on YouTube.

All I know is that 'I shouldn't talk about these things to people I'm watching drama with,' much less 'I shouldn't talk about the principles of the RAS cipher in a way that I'm good at.