"Don't look at me!"

"Who is the girl who you talk now?"

"I make this my very best for you"

"I forgive you only this time"

"I can't understand the reason why I should do such a thing for you"

-----

I have never seen women who speak the above for my life.

If I meet them, I back off with frozen smile, and run out with full effort.

In conclusion, I think that there is no reflection to the real world, and we cannot call this game "simulation".

-----

I read Wikipedia again, I found that the another definition of "simulation" is

"A method that is used for things that is very difficult impossible and dangerous to activate, or confirm the conditions and actions"

According to this definition, subjective persons who play "love simulation game" are

"Very difficult impossible and dangerous to activate, or confirm the conditions and actions"

-----

The consequence of this study is as follow.

The persons who enjoy playing "love simulation game" are in real society (the rest is omitted)

Now I am broadcasting the concept of "weekend researcher" on the web site. But I forgot to write a important information about this issue.

"Senior weekend researcher becomes tired"

-----

I think that it is true that a weekend researcher is one of the enjoyable life styles.

In fact, there was no problem of this idea shortly before.

Recently, "fatigue" is coming, that I have never seen before.

I am tired of making data analytics and simulators.

To tell you the truth, I am really surprised that

I become tired, though even I do what I want.

I have never experiment such a stranger thing until now.

-----

So I want to cast a spell on you, from as one senior engineer,

"You must realize that your happiness does not last forever."

(Continuation from yesterday)

Going back to the board,

one reason I go to a voting place, is

to show my daughter to my policy that I perform my duty as a Japanese

vainly,

For me, if possible,

- not to accept any bribe,

- to research all candidates one by one,

- not to find any candidate from the bottom of my heart,

Even so, I who go to a voting place,

should be applauded

If you applaud me, I could continue my effort for many years to come.

(To be continued)

(Continuation from yesterday)

To celebrate completing the first version of the prototype program which has been improving in two months, I went to eat Hokkyoku-ramen alone.

This is a question for Hokkyoku-Ramen freak,

"Recent Hokkyoku-ramens become sweet little by little doesn't it ?"

Previously, drinking the soup every just three times, made me cough, and seven refills of water were needed by the finishing the bowl.

Yesterday, there was zero time to cough, and just one time to refill to water.

Above all, I am really filled with horror that I could feel "delicious", however, not "hot" at all.

-----

Now I feel thought attack that

"Hokkyoku-ramen is going to be downmarket"

with a back door at the at a national level.

-----

Considering the "Mouko Tanmen, Nakamoto", the shop becomes very much in the news more and more.

I have a political gospel of ""hotter tasting" is the way to "global peace"", with a reasonable logic.

Therefore I have observed the improved visibility of "Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto" with my joy.

However, if new "hot" cult want to use "Mouko Tanmen Nakamoto" for political purposes, I cannot turn a blind eye to the cult, as one of

"Hot fundamentalist"

(To be continued)

During my assignment to the US, "Mike" who was next to my partition, died, and I experienced a funeral in the United States.

There was a hall like a little concert venue in the church, and a lot of people, as if all people in the town.

Several people talked about memories of the deceased at the stage of the hall, and the participant listened to the story and was raising

"very loud laugh"

-----

In the story when the deceased was playing tennis,

"When it became a final match, when the opponent's smashed came in at the end of the court, and we got a sorry sigh. But He shouted out loud - "Just!" (*)

(*) In general tennis, we play games with such a self judge.

In other words, he said "he was a funny and fun guy that the deceased is vulgarious about winning", and he was inviting the laughter of the venue.

I have been in the US for two years, and I feel that "there are about half a wonderful culture and a non-wonderful culture in the United States"

Among them, I think that the funeral "to remember the deceased with smiling" goes into the top class of a wonderful culture.

(However, you need to think a little, that among the United States, "Fort Collins" in Colorado, had large IT companies and a state university and most people were intellectual people)

-----

In comparison, to review the funeral in our country

- Odorless meaning Unknown senescence, smell of incense sticks

- Participants who can not do anything other than burning incense by walking

- Buddhist sermon, we do not know what they were talking about, and worse than our newcomer presentation.

- With ordinary, no substitute greetings by the mourner

"What on earth is it for anyone?"

"Is not the funeral to remember the deceased?"

I always think it again and again.

-----

I was self-evaluating "Speech Failure" on the previous evening's greeting, and I was planning to recover from the mourning greeting at the main funeral.

It is not a story of "people like everywhere". I will talk about my father's story with my feelings and in my words (and within a minute)"

-----

At the venue in the late night night without anyone, I was continuing to elaborate the contents of my speech, by myself in front of my father in the coffin.

I go home late every day, but when I talk to my daughter, I sometimes have a conversation for about three hours at midnight.

The other day, I was talking in the thesis of

"How important is Love in Life?"

"Preliminarily, let us define the importance here as "oxygen or carbohydrate" as meaning "the proportion of the heart necessary for one's survival". Of course, there is no problem in the value of subjectivity.

I declared and started it first.

-----

Daughter (Eldest daughter): "Well, I'm about 60%"

Ebata: "It's amazing. It's a feeling that love is all."

Daughter: "... what do you want to say?"

Ebata: "You're young, it's good"

Daughter: "I thought you would say that anyway. So what about you, dad?"

Ebata: "Like red ginger of grilled buckwheat"

Daughter: "You were poor. Would you have been more when you were young ?"

Ebata: "When I was young, maybe ... it might have been pepper in Unaju Don"

Daughter: "Is it increasing now?"

Ebata: "It's almost an increase like a division by zero"

-----

Here, she brought up a subject to her mother.

Daughter: "What about you mom?"

Wife："...."

Daughter: "Mom?"

Daughter: "It is about 80%, isn't it?"

Daughter: "80 percent?"

Daughter: "80%. You said that "the proportion of the heart necessary for one's survival""

Daughter: "Well, yes, yes"

While saying, my eldest daughter turned to me.

-----

I said to my daughter while nodding.

"I'm often told "Ebata is something" from various people, however,

Everyone could not notice, but mom is really more "something" than me.

The "Google Method of Working" advocates the following to increase productivity (I haven't read it)

(1) Don't do it alone.

(2) Don't do it for a long time.

(3) Don't attend meetings.

Okay, maybe this is the right thing to do "to increase productivity".

But simply replacing it with "I don't care of productivity", the method falls apart in tatters.

-----

Me, I've studied productivity pretty thoroughly.

As a result, I found that "there is no agreed-upon definition of productivity.

I also learned that there is no strong correlation between "productivity" and "happiness".

-----

The triadic argument, "Increase productivity = happiness" and "Happiness = goodness," is established from "Increase productivity = goodness.

However, it can also be interpreted as,

"Why can't someone other than me make it more productive?"

Furthermore, I can't know that "Google Method of Working" gives me joy and pleasure of mine.

- Even if I don't write your own column, someone else writes an interesting column, so I can read it.

- There are many people who can draw beautiful illustrations in the world, so I can outsource to them.

- I can ask a professional to do the coding for me.

I think these are absolutely right.

(To be continued)

I'm currently researching programming education and other STEM education, and I've found that when I try to find the source of it, I end up with something terrible.

But so far, I seem to be the only one who has tied it to that.

-----

Recently, I watched,

NHK BS Premium: Frankenstein's Temptation "The Birth of the Atomic Bomb: Scientists' Crime and Punishment

(Replayed again today at 11:45)

It's the "Manhattan Project."

-----

This time, I would like to talk about it from an engineering perspective.

(1) Sudden success in the first experiment

On July 16, 1945, three weeks before the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, the "Trinity Experiment" was conducted to test the detonation of a plutonium bomb, the Fat Man.

"The experiment suddenly succeed?"

I thought.

It was unimaginably difficult to control the detonation (implosion) of a protonium core by uniformly applying the same pressure in two millionths of a second.

Without the present technology of of GSP and EtherCAT, it would have been very difficult to achieve such high precision timing.

Implosion is the question of whether you can crush a tomato without destroying it, and it is the process of using explosives to compress a tomato into a smaller size, like a ping-pong ball or a pachinko ball, without bursting it.(They achieved this by induced detonation of explosives of different properties.)

As an engineer, I thought , "Well, out of a hundred times, they probably succeeded one time on a whim."

Before the Trinity experiment, I'm sure they conducted many preliminary tests of implosion, but I couldn't find out how they judged the success or failure of those tests.

(2) The atomic bomb was dropped on Japan only three weeks after the first test (Trinity experiment).

"Could it be weaponized in just three weeks?"

To begin with, transporting a weapon with nuclear material from the US mainland to Japan was insane.

Although the probability was low, there was also the possibility of a misfire, and the carrier may be exposed to radiation.

In the first place, there were very few people who understood the horror of the atomic bombing in those days.

(In fact, there was an accident in which a researcher who stepped over a nuclear material died instantly.)

(3) Successful explosion on the first try

This was also a great thing. Bomb duds are a fact of life. "It's not uncommon for a bomb to be dropped, but fail to explode.

Generally, "first use weapons" are going "duds," but the second and third detonated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki without fail.

It was not normal.

Seriously, if only the U.S. had dropped just one unexploded bomb on Japan...

Well, the U.S. would never give its top secret to an enemy country.

-----

In other words, the Manhattan Project was not just a project to develop an atomic bomb, but it was a plan from the beginning to use it as a weapon (storage, transportation, and operation).

When we think of nuclear energy, we tend to be drawn to theories, energy, control, and so on.

As an engineer, I can't help but marvel at the "operational technology" (OT).

-----

Well, look at this US coronary vaccine development project, "Operation Warp Speed"

"I'm still afraid of that country when it gets serious."

I can't help but think so.