(Continuation from yesterday)

Come to think about it,

On more than five subjects

More than several hundreds mandatory basic knowledges(like English words, history years, or conjugations) are needed for each subject,

Moreover,

Based on the knowledges, a logical thinking is needed.

If you think that a teenager can complete the hard tasks in just over a year, I am sorry that

you are too optimistic.

But in real life, they cannot go entrance examination places, unless they realize the "optimistic".

-----

So,

Students don't need great efforts to input these enormous knowledges in less time"

but, "teachers should get terrific techniques to make them input the knowledges"

In addition, the teachers only use one chance of lecture for several students at the same time.

It must be a blessing art.

(To be continued)

Continuing to the last diary,

About both "big data" and "open source" implementing full functions

the commonly observed features are

"Too big is not good"

The bigger objects are, the more difficult they are observed and managed totally.

-----

My main work is to research something ( I am a "research engineer"), so I often read several books and materials simultaneously.

In this digital era, I feel unreasonable to open several books on the desk, however,

associating between these several information is too difficult for PC or smart-phone.

As a result, I am sorry that I have to install many display on the wall, and waste the electric power.

In my room, an opened Note PC is attached on the wall. my wife said "like opened and dried fish".

I mean,

"Too small is not good"

The smaller objects are, the more difficult they are observed and managed totally.

-----

This means, even if it is big data, or source code, or PC or smart-phone,

"each of them is not good for human being"

might be true.

To resolve the problem,

"we have to embed USB I/F on the back of our neck, and connect our brains with computer systems"

might be the last method, I think.

I am not an aggressive riot security police of Interior Ministry, however I also want it.

"Time-saving" is promoted by "Working way reform" in recent years

"A middle-aged is spending time at a cheap bar, after being kicked out, has nothing to do, no place to go.

When I hear the story, I thought reflectively

"It's a lie."

However, there seems to be a person who "does not do it after being driven out of the company" certainly exists.

Well, here,

Coming home early, which is the person valuable,

(A)watching animation at home, or building a system of hobbies,

(B)spending time at a cheap bar

is absolutely the latter(B). He opens his wallet.

If he uses money, the economy turns.

"A middle-aged is spending time at a cheap bar, after being kicked out" should be added to the government white paper as role model of "working reform".

I saw something awesome.

I tried to reproduce "Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto No. 2" with one piano.

The audience's reactions are weak, but does this mean that they can easily do this level of performance?

I can not believe it very much.

------

If it is two piano version, I know it.

For example, this performance is like that.

"Nodame Cantabile" also appeared.

However, I think that reproducing a concert (concerto) with "one piano" is really a great thing.

------

As I mentioned before, when I was a child, practicing piano was painful.

I still feel nauseous when I listen to Mozart (especially piano solo).

When you listen to a Mozart piano, I am about to say "I get angry without asking a question" (although I know it is unreasonable).

Especially, the days when the training of using the finger for piano, was that it was a nightmare and a hopeless pain (maybe it was this book))

Well, I was wrong too.

When I was a child, I could not open my intention, that

"There is no intention to improve piano technology",

and

"Even if I could not play a music perfectly, I didn't care of it at all"

-----

I was not aiming to be a professional, but I just played the music happily.

However, the piano teacher. why was she so arrogant ?

"A truly talented child" will not come to the "town piano class".

Why didn't she understand that such children should "go" or "take away" to a proper music school ?

"A teacher like you, should have a stundent like me"

"You can lose you hand, and I can enjoy the lesson". It is "win-win".

I can say that now.

-----

If I heard the "Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto No. 2" with one piano, I thought I could change my life.

Well, It is no way.

I've told you several times that I was a student who covered my tuition and living expenses by working part-time during the latter half of my six years of college and graduate school.

A part-time job is, in a word, the equivalent exchange of time and money.

In particular, the engineering school of science and technology was a place where time was "ripped off" by experiments and reports, so there was little time left to cut back.

However, if you stop all of these things, such as dating, drinking, love, blue-collar arguments, and going home, you'll be able to find some "time".

Of course, this was just my case. I would like to refrain from talking about this as a general commentary.

Putting that aside.

-----

My greatest concern now is the desperate situation of students who are in similar situations to mine under the corona disaster.

In a situation where they can't go out, many students can't even cut their time.

Applying this environment to my situation at the time, the answer was one thing "expulsion".

-----

Under these circumstances, the most likely part-time jobs for engineering students are

Web design, simple programming (x system construction), VBA for Excel, etc.

However, without a certain level of coding ability, it seems a bit difficult.

If you are not an engineering major,

Blog writing (writing blogs and columns on designated topics), cram schools and tutors who give remote lectures

There may be some such things, but even this will be tough without a certain amount of IT literacy.

-----

There may be a second or third wave of coronal catastrophe coming, and it is said that a pandemic will come once every 10 years.

The position of programming education for elementary and junior high school students may be changing in the future.

From "education in logical thinking" to "means to survive in the event of a pandemic disaster"

"No bug, no program"

If you know a program that the bug does not exist, please show it to me.

A program that doesn't have bugs is simply not going through the routines that bugs go through.

Such things are common knowledge in program development.

And my programs are often found to be buggy by others, who then point them out to me.

It's so embarrassing, so humiliating to the point of death, that it even makes me want to kill the guy who found the bug.

-----

But even so, I gritted my teeth, and with a tight smile on my face,

"Thank you very much for finding the bug in my program"

It is the common sense of the inhabitants of the program world to say thank you in this way.

"You wouldn't understand, I guess"

Especially for gangsters who care about their pride to death, I think it would be a very unbelievable worldview.

-----

I believe that politicians and the Self-Defense Forces are also organizations where "pride" is important.

So, I can understand that

"Defense Minister protests against reports of verification of large-scale vaccination system, calling it "malicious"

But that's not the right way to behave.

I am not a sympathizer of the Asahi Shimbun or the Mainichi Shimbun.

However, as far as this one thing goes.

"Thank you for finding the glitch in the system"

is correct

-----

I have the utmost respect for all of you who have managed, in such a short period of time, to get the "reservation system for the large-scale vaccination center for the new coronavirus vaccine" up and running.

In addition, I am well aware of how difficult it is to incorporate such exception handling measures into a working system.

As a system engineer, I am one of those who can truly understand the dilemma of "a system that must continue to operate based on the goodwill of the people"

-----

And yet, the Minister of Defense has to say,

'Thank you very much'

just for this. I'm sure you must be so frustrated that your guts are boiling over.

"I cannot work because I am busy for work".

I believe that many people had experiments of this feeling, as business persons.

This means that "I cannot do the work that I want to do, because I am busy for the work I don't want to do"

The English word "labor" as a mean of "working" seems to be "pain".

In other words, it seems that "to begin with, labor is pain, so we cannot reward is the price of the pain"

My wife once told me that "'fun work' is a contradiction".

-----

I have works that I don't want to do, on the other hand , I also have the work that I want to do. So I might be lucky.

However, the works that I want to do, are not based on works orders from my company, but my will. And in many case, they are "under the table", that I don't tell anyone about the works.

Even if the works are "under the table", I am going to open about the work and try to contribute my company's profit. Therefore my acts are not "conflict of interest".

In face, many outputs of mine are generated from "under the table".

-----

However, if you tell me that "you are in too luxury situation to hide your works under the table", I cannot refute you.

So, I wonder "fun work" ultimately means the same thins as "slacking off" or something like that.

"Technology is constantly advancing", I know it well.

I wonder how much easier my work (demonstration) would have been if this antenna had been around 15 years ago.

I can still recall the desperate, physically demanding installation of antennas on the roof of a department store in the rain in order to secure a route for the radio waves.

I even studied to build my own antenna with the same level of performance as this one.

What? The Radio Law? Sorry, I am an engineer, so I am a layman in the legal side.

-----

I wonder what all those hardships I (we) went through were all about -- it's a very empty feeling.

I mentioned before that if we wait 20 years, anyone can get a "supercomputer with the same performance as at present".

If so, I wonder if I (we) have been fighting for the sake of "technological issues that will be solved in 20 years.

-----

At least,

-- Our painful and severe demonstrations were a necessary sacrifice to advance the technology over those 20 years.

If I didn't think so, I wouldn't be doing it.