I am now too busy to update my diary.
I have kept working for 24hours 7days, and I feel I have a fever (Cold?)
I have several tips but I don't have time to translate the contents.
I know well that nobody doesn't read my English and never expect my English. Even if I stop this translation, I know that I can never resume it again.
So I don't stop it for me.
(Continuation from yesterday)
My wife works at the Japanese restaurant, and she often tells me that she has faced the difference of the table manner of foreign persons .
For example, when they eat a sea food dinner, some foreign person blast out of the fish bony directly on their table.
I also had experimented some scene during my solo travel in the continent, and had found myself fearful in the center of the tables.
Of course, I think that we have to have a mind to tolerate such scenes without disgusting, if we are mentally prepared to live in the modern era of expanding globalization.
But if we were a person who watch the ugly table manner, or should clear the table, I am afraid that
"It would be easy to connect a disgust of the nation or race where the persons belong."
It is not so easier that human being exceed some unpleasant about waste and nasty smell by reasonings or logics.
And, I think it is a very serious problem that only one or two person's attitude acts on the whole evaluation of their nation and race directly and easily.
-----
Therefore, I play the virtual Ebata -- who is manly, unemotional, willpower, and has giving soul and sober atmosphere, nobody can watch ordinarily.
Because even if it is good or not, I am going to have a duty of represent Japan whenever I am not in Japan.
(To be continued)
(Continuation from yesterday)
In the generations of 10-20 years old (and my college life too), words , "Marx", "Lenin", "Trotsky," "red flag", "International" or something were sorts of
"Bomb words"
It is a violent interpretation, however, we had a clear risk that a person who know the words were labeled as "Human beings to affirm the power recapture "by the violence.""
It was not important that what kinds of ideology the person had.
At the stage when they came out the "bomb word", it is almost "end".
Of course, any company hesitates to adopt the students who know such a word, and their friend would go away.
So, young people was feared that someone knew they had the book, such as "Kapital", "Communist Manifesto" and something.
It is difficult to explain something example, however,
"Coming out to be an LGBT"
or something.
In my mind, I think that this example is not "close" and moreover there is even a possibility of misleading.
(To be continued)
(Continuation from yesterday)
Well, if continuing the logic, we can reach to the following story.
That is a relationship between
a guardian who continues to say "Study soon!"
and
a child who keeps feeling annoying
Applying this relationship to the above conclusion, "the guardian is always wrong" might to be right.
However, I think that the guardian is not applicable to the logic.
-----
That means that the behaviors of guardian is not based on "making their child happy".
It is based on "to not make their child miserable"
and extremely going to extremes,
"They want to save their child life, against the child's enemy"
That is a --- frantic defense instinct.
-----
The guardians have continued to observer the brutally world in their life.
It means,
(1)This world is under control of the people who are or has been studying.
(2)The people have frozen heart brutally against a person who are or has been studying.
in the world.
If asked why the guardians look the world like that,
Guardians themselves are living their daily life in abandoning "people who do not study" in their society ruthlessly.
If not, they can keep their life with you.
(To be continued)
It was on a train at late night on Friday night.
I was surprised because a man in front of me, started talking loudly at the incoming smartphone.
Since commuter train is my precious study, telephone conversation in the train always annoys me. However, the inside manners have improved recently, and I rarely came across such a case.
-----
The man was speaking in a loud voice, as if he could make everyone hear his story.
"So, I left my 2 million yen bag in the train."
"What?"
"At the Tokyo station, the officer keeps that bag, so I'm on the way to taking it "
"No, I can not make it in time for the last train, so I will use a taxi from Tokyo Station on the way home."
-----
I thought that "perhaps, this man, within a radius of 20 km, was one of the most uneasy feeling now"
He will not be able to wipe anxiety until confirming that 2 million yen with your eyes and holding it by hand.
Because of that anxiety, he is calling in a loud voice in the train.
If it was true, I thought,
"It is O.K."
I wanted him to cheer up, "if you can soften even a little anxious, keep talking on a smartphone forever"
-----
However, from the security point of view, I thought that this man's remarks were masculine.
Someone took that man back, and confirmed he received 2 million yen cash, they knocked him down from behind. They can rob the 2 million yen without labor.
-----
However, I thought that this man was perhaps panicked
Even he called a loud voice in the car, even he made a cheeky remark, I thought that he would have been panicked, and been able to see the surrounding.
The other day, I saw a young woman using a smartphone to draw portraits (maybe anime-like characters) on a train.
When I was standing near the door, the screen of the woman's smartphone came into my eyes and I noticed that.
The line she was drawing was a soft line that was expressed in shades, so at first I thought that she was practicing calligraphy on my smartphone screen.
However, if she is writing a letter, a line will be drawn in an impossible direction. Or I felt that it was "weird" because she was writing a line strangely,and erasing a line.
So, when the woman pulled (shrinked) the smartphone screen, I could understand that she was drawing the character of the boy's face of anime-like character.
"It's great"
I was impressed.
-----
I can not deny that the smartphone is a "time-consuming device".
A smartphone makes it easy to read the comments of other people, read the news, watch the video, and play a game.
I thought that I introduced you to the story that "a student who noticed that has changed his/her smartphone to oneself".
In that way, I basically thought that smartphones were difficult devices to "create" simply by receiving information (there was a “smartphone novel”).
Apparently, the way of thinking may be getting old.
(To be continued)
I received the postcard of the confirmation code for "NHK Plus", a service that allows me to watch NHK programs on your computer.
I just entered the code.
While working at home, NHK content is good for me, because I can watch them without disturbing my thoughts.
There is no problem with cloud server settings and paperwork. Programming is also okay for me.
On the other hand, "column writing", "development of invention" and "use case devising" is bad for me.
On the contrary, for these three things, "while walking" is better.
-----
From time to time, I am walking around town for over an hour --- wearing a mask and holding a book and notebook.
Sometimes I suddenly stop and write memorandoms down in my notebook. It may be annoying, however, I don't think there will be any problems because I'm walking in a place where no one can find it, so
For example, I study "quantum computer" while "walking".
-----
I'm walking while saying soliloquy "why does that happen? "isn't it funny?"
So, whether or not there was a coronal disaster, I don't think anyone is approaching me.
In the anime "Silver Spoon", there is a scene where the protagonist argues against his father.
"A human who fails... humans who have failed once, should not do anything? They should be denied by just one mistake?"
"We are just like economic animals. One illness, one injury, going to a disposal site, if productivity drops. That's the same with economic animals!"
"No, some owners don't even dispose of economic animals easily. Even an equestrian horse has the chance to fly a second time if the horse fails to jump"
"I am less than an economic animal?"
-----
I understand his claim.
I realized it in particular, I was taken to Mito instead of Chiba due to a single failure to select the route at the junction of the Metropolitan Expressway.
If you make a mistake once, you will not get a second chance.
All Metropolitan Expressway users are "economic animals".
The new coronavirus is an unknown infectious disease for which conventional wisdom does not apply.
Cholera, dysentery, and influenza could be easily contained with the measures taken over the past year.
However, this new coronavirus is a pathogen with "unexpected" infectivity and lethality with a question of "What the hell kind of devil manufactured this?"
So, if I were to talk only about this issue, I would say, "Is the government's response really that bad?
If I were a politician, I'm not sure I could take any other measures.
At least, our prime minister is,
(1)not the kind of moron who gets infected right before a presidential election,
(2)not the dictator who is ridiculed by the world for saying things like, "There are no infected people in our country"
(3)not the president who says things like "it's just a cold" and "we're all going to die", like a small-brain animal,
(4)not the president who has ever said, "We have conquered this through prayer," or come up with some crazy theory like, "We don't have coronary infections in our country" because they didn't do PCR testing.
Yeah, when I pick up on it like this, I can clearly see that "politicians with intelligence problems" can be a terrible menace to the people.
-----
Of course, it is true that these politicians and bureaucrats in our country are enraging me(us) and disappointing me (us).
However, I think it is not a good idea to equate their actions with the government's response to the new coronavirus.
Because this new coronavirus is akin to an "all-out attack on humanity by unknown extraterrestrial life forms".
Against such an unknown enemy, there is no way to formulate the "right strategy" from the beginning.
As I wrote here, the vaccines for the new coronaviruses (especially the mRNA vaccine) were made by incredible luck.
-----
I'm not saying that only "'those who can raise the issue before it arises' are allowed to criticize"
Only with regard to this new coronavirus countermeasure, I think we should give some thought to whether or not we can make the same kind of criticism of the previous problems.
-----
By the way,
The representative of the Rikken Democratic Party, Yukio Edano, made a statement that "the worst is the governor of Osaka" (please Google the content to find out).
So, if I may be so bold, I would like to make a suggestion to the Governor of Osaka Prefecture, Hirofumi Yoshimura.
Why don't you make a comment like the following?
"Yes, it is. Osaka may be in a kind of 'meltdown' right now"
"I wish the corona was something that could be predicted by something like the System for Prediction of Effects of Radiation Emergency (SPEEDI)"
"If a politician or chief cabinet secretary does not tell the people about such life-threatening matters as soon as possible, he or she should at least commit suicide by cutting his or her stomach"
I think that the news of mass media are generally correct, however, they are fileted. So we have to be careful of the news.
Nowadays we Japanese, ranged from the government to citizens, is all about "support for Ukraine".
I also support for Ukraine both emotionally and egoistically.
However, I am anxious for the contents of the news.
The news, like "Ukrainian troops recaptured areas under their control" or "The Russian military is not in control" are broadcasting quite preferential and frequent, however, I would like you to be care about the news.
Any media tends to prior to broadcast the news which will make us happy for us.
Of course I know that perfect fair press is a dream, and we have to hear and read the filtering news.
My concern is that 'I (we) will be hurt later'.
-----
Regarding the pro-democracy movement by students before the Tiananmen Square protests in China (1989), Japanese news papers ---- particularly, the Asahi Shimbun was the leading company, were
"China's democratization is now a done deal"
all over the paper making the above argument.
I believed it.
After that, many citizens and students were killed by the China movement and army at the Tiananmen Square incident.
Now the China government has erased the incident from the history ---- pretended that is did not exist ---- So I cannot know the specific victim numbers.
(One of the figures I remember is that "4,000 people were murdered.")
-----
As long as I remember, the news paper company that had written "China's democratization is now a done deal" condemned the massacre of the people by the Chinese government, however,
They did not engage in any self-criticism of our own judgment regarding the news coverage before the incident. "NOT AT ALL"
However, I don't want to condemn mass media's attitudes, including the news paper company.
I tell you again, that the choice of new source apt to be based on the bias from our hopes.
Any mass media has an personality as a Legal Entity, and an interest organization, so it cannot be helped.
-----
The remaining problem is
"I believed in the media, I believed in democracy, and I was betrayed in the worst possible way and left alone"
です。
Again, the news in the media is generally correct, but it is filtered.
We need to keep that in mind to protect our own hearts and minds.
Usually, I don't watch a variety program on TV. The reason is not "I don't like it" but "I have little time to watch it."
However, I watch a variety of TV programs whose title is "IPPON gand prix".
This is a great comedy variety show that has been aired irregularly since 2009 on the Fuji Television network, however, I watch it with a sense of awe that cannot be contained by this introduction.
In this program, comedians respond to a given task with a phrase and are graded on their performance in real-time -- and the level is frighteningly high.
I don't know if they prepare their answers in advance, or if they ad-lib their answers -- well, I'm sure that is disclosed to some extent in the operation of the program -- but
the content nevertheless makes us laymen laugh, and we can't help but be tongue-tied by the content.
If I were able to attend, I can be sure that even if I were given the subject a week in advance, I would not be able to come close to a few tenths of a percent of the sharp answers given by the comedians.
----
I wonder if young aspiring comedians will change their minds (give up) about becoming a comedian after watching "IPPON Grand Prix"?
If it were me, I would not want to live in that scary world.